The UN Security Council has unanimously renewed the mandate of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) for another year along the Israel-Lebanon border, despite Israel’s push to reduce the extension to six months. Israel’s efforts were thwarted by strong opposition from France and other UN members. This decision comes amid ongoing attacks by Hezbollah, which has fired thousands of rockets and drones into Israel. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu emphasized the need to restore security and criticized the UN for not adequately addressing Hezbollah’s growing military presence in southern Lebanon. Additionally, Israel has accused the UN of failing to enforce the arms embargo on Iran in Lebanon and fully implement Resolution 1701. Israel’s ambassador to the UN warned that if UNIFIL does not take action against Hezbollah, Israel will.
For those unfamiliar with the geopolitics, UNIFIL is the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon, a UN organization initially established as a temporary measure to regulate border disputes. In 1978, the Lebanese government sought to distance itself from the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) after the PLO launched a significant commando operation against Israel. During this attack, eleven terrorists from the PLO infiltrated Israel from Lebanon by sea and hijacked an Israeli civilian bus traveling along the coastal road near Tel Aviv. The attack resulted in the deaths of 35 civilians, including 13 children, and 71 others were wounded. This initial attack, which intensified tensions between Israel and Lebanon, is notably underrepresented on the official UNIFIL website, which instead emphasizes a subsequent Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) attack on Lebanon that killed 120 civilians.
> *”On 11 March 1978, a commando attack in Israel resulted in many dead and wounded among the Israeli population; the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) claimed responsibility for that raid.”*
This wording minimizes the severity of the incident, describing it as a “raid” and using vague terms like “many” instead of detailing the full extent of the tragedy. The omission and framing of these events highlight some of the longstanding issues with UNIFIL’s approach to maintaining peace in the region. Following the attack, Israel invaded Lebanon, and the buffer zone—an area of no man’s land between Israel and Lebanon—has remained a contentious point ever since.
Resolution 1701:
> *”The 1701 resolution called for the full cessation of hostilities, the deployment of Lebanese forces to Southern Lebanon, parallel withdrawal of Israeli forces behind the Blue Line, strengthening the UN force (UNIFIL) to facilitate the entry of Lebanese Forces in the region, and the establishment of a demilitarized zone between the Blue Line and the Litani River. It also calls for the UN Secretary-General to develop proposals to implement the relevant provisions of the Taif Accords as well as Security Council Resolutions 1559 (2004) and 1680 (2006) and imposes an arms embargo on Lebanon. The resolution was formally agreed to by both parties within 48 hours of its adoption.”*
Despite this resolution, UNIFIL remains in the area due to ongoing issues with Hezbollah crossing the Litani River boundary and Israel responding to rocket fire from Lebanon, activities that were supposed to cease decades ago. The recent news is that the UN Security Council has renewed UNIFIL’s mandate against Israel’s preference for a shorter six-month term, ensuring that the peacekeeping forces remain in place for another year.
Discussion about this post